A federal court denied a petition for rehearing in a case surrounding United Airlines' vaccine mandate — one judge accusing the company of " coerc[ing] its employees into violating their religious beliefs."
Judges for the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, widely considered the most conservative federal court, voted 13-4 on Thursday to deny a rehearing. The court also denied United Airlines' request to vacate a panel opinion from February , which held that the mandate inflicted irreparable harm and remanded the case to district court.
Trump-appointed Judge James Ho penned a concurring opinion , admonishing the airline for creating a "crisis of conscience" for its employees, and warned of new wave of corporatism in the Unites States that seeks to inflict its cultural values on Americans.
Ho wrote that mandating employees with sincere religious objections to take vaccines that "were developed using aborted fetal tissue" or face indefinite unpaid leave, is an "obvious irreparable injury" because it "press[ures employees] into violating one's faith." Ho said:
Being placed on indefinite unpaid leave because your employer doesn't like your religious beliefs is obviously an adverse employment action and an actionable claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. And you've obviously suffered irreparable injury when you're forced to violate your faith in order to get your job back. The injury would be entirely reparable by money damages if it was just about a loss of money."
But it's not. It's about a loss of faith. And it's about a crisis of conscience. You're being coerced into sacrificing your faith in order to keep your job. No measure of damages makes sense in this scenario. To keep your job, you must violate your faith. How much money would it take for you to sell out your faith?
Notably, United Airlines had one of the strictest coronavirus vaccine mandates in the country for a private company, even compared to competing airlines. Last August, the airline told its 67,000 U.S. employees that they would have to get vaccinated against the virus or face firing. United reported that roughly 96 percent complied with the mandate, though several hundred who refused were fired . Approximately 2,200 employees received religious and medical exemptions, though that consisted of the company granting them what it called a "reasonable accommodation" by placing them on unpaid leave and stripping them of their medical benefits.
The mandate resulted in an ongoing lawsuit . In September 2021, six United Airlines employees sued the company over the mandate in a class action lawsuit on behalf of the 2,200 seeking exemptions, alleging the company violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by discriminating against them based on their religious beliefs and medical conditions.
The case is back in the hands of District Judge Mark Pittman, who is also a Trump appointee. However, the airline allowed unvaccinated staff to return to work on March 28, citing a "steep decline" in coronavirus cases as the reason for the policy change.
Ho emphasized that "courts should hold [corporations] accountable, no less and no more than individuals." He added:
Corporations are not people. But like people, corporations are capable of following the law as well as violating it. Moreover, by combining and coordinating human efforts, corporations can do a lot more. They can have a greater impact on society than most individuals. As a result, corporations can achieve far greater good—and cause much greater harm. So when corporations violate the law, courts should hold them accountable, no less and no more than individuals.
Ho also noted that if this case is "pathbreaking," it is not because of how law is being applied but because of the "behavior of industry."
"Historically, corporations typically focus on increasing shareholder value—not on imposing certain cultural values on others. But that is rapidly changing," he said.
Ho pitched a hypothetical situation in which an employer who does not care about employee productivity "insists that you abandon certain religious beliefs he finds offensive, whether it's abortion, marriage, sexuality, gender, or something else."
"But here's the thing: What was once hypothetical is now rapidly becoming reality. Examples of this abound," he wrote, citing various news stories as examples. " So this case may be the first, but I suspect it will not be the last."
Ho further cited a passage from Woke, Inc.: Inside Corporate America's Social Justice Scam , about how "companies use their market power to make moral rules, they effectively prevent . . . other citizens from having the same say in our democracy." He wrote:
My point today is less ambitious: We know what this new corporate trend is doing to employees. It's violating the religious convictions of workers across the country. And in cases like this, the injuries are irreparable. So unlike the dissent, I'm grateful that our court is taking the action it is today.
"And unlike the dissent, I don't think our circuit will be alone, as cases like this inevitably multiply across the country, assuming corporate trends persist. But if our circuit turns out to be alone in its defense of religious liberty, I'll be grateful for our actions today all the same, " he concluded.
The case is Sambrano v. United Airlines , No. 21-11159 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
- Supreme Court examines discrimination lawsuits against religious schools
- U.S. Supreme Court conservatives lean toward shielding religious schools from suits
- Historic Win for Religious Liberty in Hobby Lobby: What It Means Today and in 2016
- Mexico’s Supreme Court nixes border governor’s extended term
- DOJ Civil Rights Division: AG William Barr Is Achieving Results for Religious Freedom
- Justices split over religious exemptions for ObamaCare birth control mandate
- U.S. Supreme Court hears Obamacare contraception mandate dispute
- Courts Halt Kentucky Gov. Beshear’s Ban on In-Person Church Services
- Distorting religious freedom will put people in danger
- U.S. Supreme Court wrestles with Obamacare contraception case
- Supreme Court kicks off second week of teleconference arguments
- Democrats spar with controversial Trump court pick over ObamaCare, Kavanaugh
- State court allows Newsom’s $75 million coronavirus aid for undocumented immigrants
- Harmeet Dhillon’s Center for American Liberty Battles Newsom’s California Lockdown
- U.S. Supreme Court's Ginsburg takes part in arguments after treatment
- Supreme Court declines to lift Pennsylvania's stay-at-home order
- Supreme Court's Ginsburg discharged from hospital
- George Conway pens op-ed predicting Trump will lose Supreme Court case over tax disclosures
- The Trump Administration Agreed To Pay More Than $3 Million In Legal Fees To Settle Contraception Mandate Lawsuits
- Rep. Collins urges Esper to defend religious freedom after multiple attacks on military chaplains
|Wilson Federer Court 15-Pack Bag4.3★ / check it now at Amazon||The Bible Makes Us Baptists, formerly In Editha's Days : A Tale of Religious Liberty$15.99||Wellspring of Liberty: How Virginia's Religious Dissenters Helped Win the American Revolution and Secured Religious Liberty$39.95||La Cristiada: The Mexican People's War for Religious Liberty$24.69||Religious Liberty in the American Republic check it now at Amazon||Challenges to Religious Liberty in the Twenty-First Century$100||Founding Faith: How Our Founding Fathers Forged a Radical New Approach to Religious Liberty$17||Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty: Emerging Conflicts check it now at Amazon||An Advent for Religious Liberty: A Pastor Stephen Grant Novel check it now at Amazon||History of Religious Liberty: From Tyndale to Madison check it now at Amazon||God vs. the Gavel: The Perils of Extreme Religious Liberty check it now at Amazon||Flipping Your Habe: Overturning Your State Conviction in Federal Court Under 28 U.S.C. 2254$34.95||Separation of Church and State: Founding Principle of Religious Liberty$22.33||World of Faith and Freedom: Why International Religious Liberty Is Vital to American National Security$38.68||Judicial Restraint in America: How the Ageless Wisdom of the Federal Courts was Invented$64.38||Examples & Explanations: Federal Courts, Third Edition$45.77||Religious Liberties for Corporations?: Hobby Lobby, the Affordable Care Act, and the Constitution$68.37||Religious Liberty and the American Supreme Court: The Essential Cases and Documents4.7★ / $112.44||Litigating in Federal Court: A Guide to the Rules, Second Edition5.0★ / $28||Federal Courts: Cases and Materials on Judicial Federalism and the Lawyering Process, 2013 Supplement2.0★ / check it now at Amazon||Federal Courts (American Casebook Series)$232||Federal Courts in the 21st Century$79.94||In Freedom We Trust: An Atheist Guide to Religious Liberty$1.95||The Federal Courts and the Federal System, 6th Edition$9.96||Finding Common Ground: A Guide to Religious Liberty in Public Schools$1.88||Litigating Immigration Cases in Federal Court$96||Federal Courts (University Casebook Series)$13.74||Federal Courts: Hart & Wechsler 6e (Casenote Legal Briefs)$6.7||Federal Courts: Examples & Explanations, 2nd Edition$13.35||A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law (The University Center for Human Values Series) check it now at Amazon||Gilbert Law Summaries on Federal Courts$11||Federal Courts: Cases and Materials, 4th (American Casebooks)2.7★ / $208||Religious Liberty in Western Thought (Emory University Studies in Law and Religion)$19.99||New Netherland and the Dutch Origins of American Religious Liberty (Early American Studies) check it now at Amazon||Real Threat and Mere Shadow: Religious Liberty and the First Amendment (Rutherford Institute Report, Vol 5) check it now at Amazon||Travail of Religious Liberty check it now at Amazon||On Religious Liberty: Selections from the Works of Roger Williams (The John Harvard Library) check it now at Amazon||Religion and Politics: Issues in Religious Liberty (Ideas in Conflict Series)$14.8||Archbishop Lefebvre & Religious Liberty (Roman Catholic) check it now at Amazon||Religious liberty on trial: Hanserd Knollys, early Baptist hero$6.99||Federal Courts Examples & Explanations$7.22||The Dutch Reformation: a history of the struggle in the Netherlands for civil and religious liberty in the sixteenth century check it now at Amazon||The Case for Christianity: St. Justin Martyr's Arguments for Religious Liberty and Judicial Justice check it now at Amazon||The Sacred Rights of Conscience: Selected Readings on Religious Liberty and Church-State Relations in the American Founding$9.99||In Defense of Religious Liberty (American Ideals & Institutions) check it now at Amazon||Asset Forfeiture: Practice and Procedure in State and Federal Courts$99.95||License to Cheat: The Hypocrisy of Nevada Gaming Regulation and the Exploitation of the Federal Courts$19.95||Nine Men Against America : The Supreme Court and its Attack on American Liberties (The Americanist Library)$10.98||Federal Courts (Law School Legends Audio Series)$165.17||Religious Rights of Prisoners: Defending Your Rights in Federal Court$20.21|
Federal Court Nixes Vaccine Mandate, Citing Religious Liberty have 1733 words, post on www.breitbart.com at August 19, 2022. This is cached page on USA Breaking News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.