So LeBron James has offered his “endorsement”—since the traditional newspaper endorsement has lost whatever influence it ever had, it doesn’t seem too ridiculous to use the word to describe political support given by a guy who throws leather balls against the ground for a living—of Hillary Clinton for president. Or, more accurately, LeBron James™ would like you, his current and prospective consumers, to know that he is endorsing Hillary Clinton. Depending on your parameters for acceptable political discourse, this is may read as a good or a bad thing to you, with the lines most likely drawn by how closely his sentiments track your own. I, on the other hand, can’t help but think back to that old Dave Chappelle joke and wonder, “Where is Ja?”
It’s worthwhile to think back to how we got here, here being—granted that political activism by athletes is nothing new—a landscape where extremely physically fit young people feel compelled to express their political opinions, and where those opinions ramify out into the broader world, and even matter. Considerations about how Republicans, too, buy shoes matter less than they might once have to athletes ranging from Megan Rapinoe to David Ortiz. Meanwhile, the press and the public seem disinclined to dismiss what these athletes have to say as the takes of cosseted and ill-informed rich young people, and eager to read all sorts of meaning into them.
The main question here is a simple one: Why?
You could argue that it was LeBron James himself, with help from his then-Miami Heat teammates, who kickstarted the new wave of athletes expressing themselves politically when he posted a photo on Twitter of him and his teammates standing in hooded sweatshirts with the hoods pulled over their heads. This was a reference to the stated suspicions of Trayvon Martin’s killer, George Zimmerman, which were piqued by little more than the color of the teenager’s skin and his choice of attire.
This kind of activism continued a couple years later, when James and some fellow players followed Derrick Rose’s lead in wearing “I Can’t Breathe” shirts—an allusion to the killing of Eric Garner—during pregame warmups.
What James started, though, has unquestionably found its fullest expression in Colin Kaepernick’s wildly successful attempts to start a dialogue about police brutality by kneeling during the national anthem. It may be a matter of timing, or of the specific nature of Kaepernick’s protest, or of the enormous and singular gravitational effect the NFL has on this country’s consciousness, but whatever the cause, Kaepernick’s protest has inspired athlete activism on a scale unseen among pro athletes in generations.
Kaepernick’s unique place in the game and the larger culture made him practically the ideal subject on which for all this to center. At the time he began his protests, he was at once a known figure—recently among the most promising young players at American sports’ most important and high-profile position—yet also perilously close to the cliff of irrelevance after having lost his starting job and standing on the verge of being cut. This made him a person whom the average sports fan would recognize and pay attention to, while also shielding him from accusations that this was a calculated branding ploy intended to make him a more marketable star. As it seemed in the moment—and as was borne out by reporting on the irate reactions of NFL team executives—there was real risk in doing what he did. It was an act of conscience.
Kaepernick also had an easily identifiable and replicable protest technique and a cogent if simple rationale behind it; further, he was and is fluent enough in the language of his stance to articulate it extemporaneously in response to questioning. This is a guy most everyone knows, standing for a contentious topic (even if it makes my brain sore imagining the mental gymnastics one must endure in order to contort oneself into justifying being offended by someone saying they would like for police not to shoot people so often) that he truly believes in, equipped to expound upon why he feels the way he does, and carrying a message that can and has inspired many of his colleagues to do the same. Match, gas, wood, fire.
That any given American citizen would have thoughts on a subject like police brutality is completely unsurprising and obviously unobjectionable. However, behind both the outrage over Kaepernick’s bent knee and much of the support for his message is the unstated premise that caused this to become A Thing in the first place: namely, that people should care what professional athletes have to say.
To people angry with Kaepernick, his national anthem protest was a direct affront to America’s core ideals, the military that protects those ideals in wartime, and the men and women comprising the various police forces which at least ostensibly defend every individual’s rights and liberties from would-be domestic assailants. Meanwhile, many of those who agreed with Kaepernick’s underlying points made the case that, actually, Kaepernick’s peaceful, symbolic protest is far more patriotic and reverent of our national ideals than silence. For these people—a group including much of the media, and most of us here at Deadspin—Kaepernick wasn’t only not wrong or un-American, he was actively right and something of a hero for telling it like it is.
Whatever effects Kaepernick’s stance has had, though, and whatever you make of of them, the thing in itself doesn’t seem like much. (In fact, Kaepernick was protesting for weeks before even minutiae-obsessed NFL reporters noticed.) It’s self-evident that even if it offends you, his unwillingness to stand for the anthem like a typical NFL player does no harm. Perhaps more importantly, his comments on state violence amount essentially to rote talking points rearranged into new-sounding sentences at impressive speed. Kaepernick sounds less like an original thinker with a comprehensive understanding of structural racism and more like a guy with high-end media training who’s read the structural racism pamphlet so many times over that he can now regurgitate its core ideas in infinite, different-ish iterations.
If you live in a big city, you can find guys at a nearby park saying much the same thing; what’s noteworthy isn’t what he’s saying, but that he’s saying it. Another way to put this would be that an unexceptional NFL player has done more to put ideas that tens of millions of people hold into the mainstream than has the fact that tens of millions of people hold them.
If you want a clue to the mystery here, consider that LeBron James—as outspoken as an athlete of his stature can be—has proven to be, on balance, a fairly staid social activist, offering almost unobjectionable opinions. He published the hoodie photo and wore the “I Can’t Breathe” shirt; he has spoken about police shootings through the eyes of a father of young black boys (albeit with some questionable All Lives Matter-type pandering rhetoric); he has proclaimed that he believes Hillary Clinton would be a better president than Donald Trump. All of this seems both worthy enough and reflective of only a surface-level engagement with the problems the country faces, which will not be solved even by general agreement that the police should not shoot unarmed black children, or that Donald Trump is bad.
It also seems reflective of where James’s peers are. For all the talk about a new generation of activist athletes, and all the real impact that athletes have unquestionably had, the most powerful athlete in America publicly supporting a candidate who will almost certainly be the next president represents something like an outer bound on the acceptable. Whatever else LeBron’s endorsement is, it’s at least something people can disagree with; more typical are statements like those made by Cam Newton or the Seattle Seahawks or Drew Brees.
Like James’s activism, their statements seem of a piece with carefully curated, corporate-friendly brand identity. (It’s telling that the topic that gets both James and Michael Jordan out from behind their veil of political abstinence is the not-exactly-politically fraught position that police shooting unarmed black men is a bad thing.) Along the same lines, the near omnipresence of All Lives Matter-like language in athletes’ comments about police brutality seems reflective not just of a lack of understanding that in the real world the phrase has connotations very different from its literal meaning, but of an impulse to not upset anyone—an impulse inimical to real political conversation.
In this light, it makes sense both that athletes would speak out and that the press and the public would listen; all parties involved have a lot of experience with athletes saying things that get a lot of attention but don’t in the end say much about anything past their brand positioning, and are subsequently analyzed in marketing terms or as a matter of locker room dynamics.
One could take all of this as a reason to criticize know-nothing athletes, or to consider a more general principle here—that most athletes, like most everyone, have nothing to say about the world at large that goes past the limits of their own experience, and that because of this, no one should concern themselves much with the things they say.
If Colin Kaepernick can’t get down into the nitty-gritty of police militarization, where he might find a thought too complex to be expressed in a soundbite, that may be because he’s been kind of busy learning how to better call a play and read a defense and step into a 30-yard pass with the correct footwork before a 300-pound defensive tackle can pick him up and slam his head into the ground. If LeBron James didn’t read the blog post that would’ve told him that All Lives Matter doesn’t mean “all lives matter,” that may be because he’s preoccupied with getting his body back in shape and ready for another gauntlet of a season coming off his sixth consecutive NBA Finals run. To say that most pro athletes haven’t amassed a deep base of knowledge in things like politics and social justice isn’t to slight them at all; it’s to acknowledge the reality of the lifelong demands of their outrageously successful careers.
The problem here isn’t that athletes have opinions on things, or that they want to express them through any of the many channels available to them. The problem—the same one that comes up when seemingly reasonable people come to the conclusion that having succeeded in Silicon Valley qualifies someone to offer takes on politics and life—is with anyone who values the opinions of strong and fast people everyone knows have no special insight into why the world is the way it is; with anyone who pretends to; and with those who use the times when athletes do have something they want to say as an opportunity to celebrate the victory of their own priors. (If you need evidence that it’s usually the specific content of these athletes’ messages that is being valorized, and not the act of political expression itself, consider how much more seriously Kaepernick’s backers in the media treat his police-brutality comments than his attacks on Hillary Clinton. Let Kevin Love come out with an endorsement of Donald Trump in a letter as unremarkable and innocuous as James’s, and we’ll see how many people are praising him for speaking his mind.)
Whether you like or dislike what Kaepernick or James have to say about policing in America or who should be the next president, their takes aren’t any more meaningful (even if they aren’t less so) than anyone else’s; they matter simply because they’re perceived to be more influential. The situation exists entirely as a matter of celebrity culture, a remnant halo effect that links entirely unrelated phenomena—an athlete’s level of fame and sporting prowess with their assumed political weightiness, say—and makes you grant them power in the political sphere that far outstrips their knowledge and engagement. It’s the same mental conflation that brands use to claim ownership of the abstract concepts like love and self-esteem which they use to sell you things. Celebrate or denounce Coke’s “America The Beautiful” commercial as you like; either way, you’ve given a carbonated drink company the power to define America.
The shame of this, though, isn’t that athletes are, for complex reasons having to do with the power of various marketing complexes, being listened to on topics outside the scope of their own experiences; it’s that because they are, they feel compelled to address them (sometimes even largely incoherently), rather than less obviously weighty ones into which they can offer direct insight, and which affect everyone’s lives.
Take Richard Sherman on player safety, or Cardale Jones on the NCAA’s exploitation of college athletes, or Richie Incognito (of all people) on the NFL’s rigged private judiciary system. These kinds of takes reveal serious thought about issues directly facing athletes, and can be generalized up as instantiations of principles at play in the lives of everyone, like how the company you work for is a self-interested entity that you should not consider your friend, or how those in power will tend to take advantage of those beneath them by pretending there are higher moral standards that justify their exploitation, or how a system for apportioning justice that is accountable only to itself is no system of justice at all.
Along these lines, I’d be legitimately fascinated to hear LeBron’s unvarnished thoughts on player vs. owner power in the NBA, after dealing with Cavaliers owner Dan Gilbert after that plantation-owner-pissed-at-the-slave-who-ran-away-sounding open letter he wrote after The Decision. That is a topic he—and arguably he alone—could hold forth on with a expertise a minute few could replicate. Hearing him do so would certainly be much more interesting than him announcing his support for Clinton for president in a glorified press release that spends most of its time extolling his personal charitable efforts.
Instead, LeBron has staked out a safe position as a Clinton supporter, as a champion of education and opportunity for children and a solemn though soft-spoken enemy to unjust killings. With each new venture into the political arena, he adds just a bit more to his credibility and reach to his burgeoning image as a political advocate without any risk or revelation.
“I support Hillary because she will build on the legacy of my good friend, President Barack Obama,” LeBron wrote, and with presumably unsolicited support like this endorsement, there’s every reason to believe he’s making a new good friend in soon-to-be President Clinton. LeBron sees that this is a game of power accumulation that society seem strangely willing to just hand over to him without him doing much of anything to show he deserves it. Do you?
- You win sometimes, other times you learn - Vijender Singh on boxing, politics and fatherhood
- Gloria Steinem blasts T.I.'s virginity checks on his daughter, 18, saying they are 'a human rights abuse' and claims the courts should be after him
- Bernie Sanders’ Political Revolution
- The alternative 2019 sports awards: quotes, gaffes and animal cameos
- Boris Johnson warns voters Jeremy Corbyn is a national security risk who will bow down to Britain’s enemies
- The Battle Against 'Hate Speech' on College Campuses Gives Rise to a Generation That Hates Speech
- Recap: Tinder Roof Rusted
- ‘You’re All F*cking Industry Tools’: The Ballad of Doug Stanhope, a Stand-Up Scumbag
- Underdog Powers: Activate!
- Tyler Hadley’s Killer Party
- Queen of Broadway and Her Texas Ranch: Betty Buckley on Divas, Horses, and Therapy
- Transcript: Correspondents Panel on "Face the Nation," December 29, 2019
- Pugilist or peacemaker: The choice facing Donald Trump
- Radio Erena: a beacon of hope for Eritrea
|Happy With What You Have to Be happy with (check at Amazon)||1.0|
|What I Have To Give, Let It Be Enough (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|A Perfect Mess: Why You Don't Have to Worry About Being Good Enough for God (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Chicken Fingers, Mac and Cheese...Why Do You Always Have to Say Please? (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Jo Frost's Confident Baby Care: What You Need to Know for the First Year from America's Most Trusted Nanny (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction, Fourth Edition (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|What American Pastors Have to Say (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|What Research Has to Say About Vocabulary Instruction (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|What Research Has to Say About Fluency Instruction (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|What God Has to Say About Eternal Life, Salvation, and Spiritual Peace (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|What There Is to Say We Have Said: The Correspondence of Eudora Welty and William Maxwell (Hardcover) by Eudora Welt (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|You Know What You Have To Do (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Why Did We Have to Say Goodbye? Valerie's Story (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|The Human Race Will Let You Down... Dogs on The Other Hand: Our Dogs and What They Have to Teach Us (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|The Nursing Home Guide: A Doctor Reveals What You Need to Know about Long-Term Care (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|8 Essential Exchanges: What You Have to Give Up to Go Up (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|The End of the World: And What Jesus Has to Say About It (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|False Christ Coming: Does Anybody Care?: What New Age Leaders Really Have in Store for America, the Church, and the World (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Fast Facts for Dementia Care: What Nurses Need to Know in a Nutshell (Fast Facts (Springer)) (Volume 1) (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Adam Lambert, Details Magazine, November 2009 issue. Why Does Every Woman In America Want to Sleep with Adam Lambert? (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|What There Is to Say We Have Said: The Correspondence of Eudora Welty and William Maxwell (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|What Every Athlete Needs to Know About Restructured Ionized Water (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Dying Words: Endangered Languages and What They Have to Tell Us (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|A Little Bit Can Hurt: The Shocking Truth about Food Allergies -- Why We Should Care,What We Can Do (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Wear Your Life Well: Use What You Have to Get What You Want (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Jo Frost's Confident Baby Care: What you need to know for the first year from the UK's most trusted nanny. (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|The Caring Code: What Boomers Need to Know About Seniors (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Title: Seasons: What College Athletes Need to Know About (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|The Official Guide for Foreign-Educated Nurses: What You Need to Know about Nursing and Health Care in the United States (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Mending the Mirror: What Science And Medicine Have To Say About Fixing The Narcissistic Personality – In Plain English (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|College in a Can: What's in, Who's out, Where to, Why not, and everything else you need to know about life on campus (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Knowledge is not Power nor is Value Serendipitous: Using What You Have to Make Your Business Profitable (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|The Claims of Christ: What Jesus Had To Say About Himself (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Why Wait?: What You Need to Know About the Teen Sexuality Crisis (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Come On Church! Wake Up!: Sin within the Church, and what Jesus Has to Say About it (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Animal Talk: What Do They Have To Say? (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|The Next Boom: What You Absolutely, Positively Have to Know About the World Between Now and 2025 (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Why You Should CARE: What Happens When You Do (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Why Does He Do That? the Key to Understanding Why Men Do What They Do in Relationships (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Men on Rape: What They Have to Say About Sexual Violence (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|The Things That Matter: What Seven Classic Novels Have to Say About the Stages of Life (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|We're Still Family: What Grown Children Have to Say About Their Parents' Divorce (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Why Does He Do That?: The Key To Understanding Why Men Do What They Do In Relationships (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|What Research Has to Say about Reading Instruction, 2nd Edition (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|You've Got to Be Believed to Be Heard: How To Persuade People To Really Listen To What You Have To Say (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Mending the Mirror: What Science and Medicine Have to Say About Fixing the Narcissistic Personality -- in Plain English (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Earth in Transition: What Spirit Has to Say About Time, Space, Human Consciousness, and the Coming Earth Changes (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Valentine's Day: 101 Love Quotes- What Celebrities, Famous People and Spiritual Gurus Have To Say About Love (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Flip the Script "Why does it always have to be about HIM?" (check at Amazon)||0.0|
Why Does Anyone Care What Athletes Have To Say About Politics? have 3539 words, post on deadspin.com at October 4, 2016. This is cached page on USA Breaking News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.